Updates to this story
I spent a good chunk of last week hanging out in Dublin, Ireland for the first MeeGo Summit. There was shopping, there was drinking, there was football and there was more drinking. There were also keynote speeches, developer meetings and a variety of sit-down talks on everything from the N900 to discussion on improving customer satisfaction with mobile applications.
And yet, the most striking impression I walked away with had nothing to do with the MeeGo OS. My most common reoccurring thought was something along the lines of, "Holy hell, Nokia and Intel have a lot of money to throw at us."
Both industry dinosaurs spent like drunken sailors with an itch. They rented out the new half-billion dollar Aviva Stadium for three days. They rented out the entire Guinness Storehouse for a night, including multiple bands and food. They bought us all tickets to a football game, provided an open bar and snacks for a thousand people for three straight nights and, to top it off, they bought us all touchscreen tablet-netbooks. The Lenovo IdeaPad S10 S3, to be specific.
The cash thrown at us would have been impressive...if it backed up anything convincing. Unfortunately, all the flash, glamor, booze & airbrushing in the world can't cover up the smell of death. MeeGo is doomed, and Nokia with it if the suits holding the purse-strings aren't careful.
Here are five things about the MeeGo Summit that sketched me the hell out.
From Open Source to Open Sores
Being 'open source' is a sign that an operating system will be inexpensive, adaptable and far less restricted than a closed platform like iOS. Having open sores is a sign of severe medical / hygiene issues.
MeeGo is one, and has the other.
There's no arguing that MeeGo is the most open operating system with the backing of major tech industry players. Every phase of its development has been handled online, detailed in mailing lists and forums in a way that even Android never was. This openness will win MeeGo points with Stallman-style geeks....and no one else.
Android is Open Source. MeeGo is Open Source. One of these has established a solid identity as a legitimate iOS competitor in the consumer mind-set, and one of these hasn't. It will take years (at least 2-3) on the market before MeeGo devices will have a chance at carving a decent chunk of market away from Android.
I'm using a MeeGo tablet now. It's loaded with 1.1, and a few hours of cobbling saw an onscreen keyboard, an office suite and a Photoshop-analog loaded. None of that stuff came stock - and the onscreen keyboard is simply Not Ready for market.
And yet, some sort of MeeGo tablet is due in early 2011. I hope Intel and Nokia find a good dermatologist before then.
MeeGo is playing the waiting game
And Nokia may not be able to afford to play along. Profits are plunging headlong into hell.
Meanwhile, the strategy espoused by Intel VP Doug Fisher at the MeeGo Summit keynote was very long-term indeed.
Mr. Fisher envisions a world of continuous computing. You will have a browsing capable machine in your car, kitchen, living room, pocket and probably bathroom. For optimal convenience, each of these devices needs to communicate. Doug played us a charming little video that showed cartoon MeeGo-people pausing movies on their televisions, stepping out into the car and playing the movie immediately from its last pause.
The point was clear. Device synergy wins markets. Customers like it when every new gadget purchased makes their other gadgets more useful. This is one reason Apple works, and it's the reason Acer launched that newfangled clear.fi thing.
Android is as fragmented as the Balkans. Apple is as closed as a Reverend's sphincter. MeeGo aims to be the open platform that also avoids fragmentation. All APIs standard! Any app will work for any device, display size allowing! A brand new world... that will take a few years to get here.
The main benefit of a MeeGo-style OS won't take hold for several years. 'Smart' devices are still rare enough that fragmentation is forgiveable. If MeeGo can hold on and grow share at a cautious rate for the next few years, it could have a shot at real success.
But keeping the OS afloat that long will take regular infusions of cash, or significant early market success. The latter isn't likely, and the former is only possible as long as Nokia and Intel have money.
Developers don't trust MeeGo
During the Summit I had the pleasure of sitting in on a developer's conference. If you've ever seen someone lose three teeth to an errant baseball pitch, you have some idea of how the whole thing felt as an observer.
Ronan Maclaverty sweated while devs from all over the world asked questions he wasn't prepared to answer. At one point, after a long explanation that failed to answer the question of why MeeGo didn't yet have a framework for developers to sell their apps, a developer from Norway shouted out: "We don't care about openness, we need to be able to make a living."
Ronan- the developer advocate for MeeGo, had no response but agreement.
I talked to a lot of developers at the Summit. I drank heavily with a couple dozen of them. Inebriation breeds honest, if slightly incoherent, conversation. We talked about MeeGo and, nine times out of ten, the talk was negative.
And the tenth time? The developer was on Nokia or Intel payroll. Though they weren't all Pro-MeeGo either, possibly as a consequence of not being eligible for Free Netbooks.
The reasons to doubt were varied. MeeGo was late to market, MeeGo showed no signs of a solid app framework, MeeGo didn't have enough to differentiate it from the popular choices. What struck me is that they all doubted. I spent close to an hour at the end of the Ireland vs. Norway match talking to an American developer for an Anonymous Large Company (it starts with an 'N').
The Summit Attendees had their own special zone off to the side of the stands. We got free booze and chips until well after the game ended. Since it was during regular stadium business hours, the cashiers kept track of every dollar in charges our giant party racked up.
Both registers showed around 2,000 euros, the last time I checked them. My Dev friend, who we'll call S, gestured grandly at the assembly of drunken coders and journalists,
"We've got one more year of this left, if we're lucky. Then?"
He made a loud farting noise.
No case for
All Summit-long, I waited for someone from Intel or Nokia to give me one good reason the market needed MeeGo. Avoiding fragmentation is fine and dandy, but Google has already turned over a new leaf, while Apple has avoided the issue entirely. WP7 looks to be taking Cupertino's route.
So we're down to the inherent Awesomeness of MeeGo as a saving grace and, frankly, I'm just not seeing it. In fairness, OS 1.2 ought to hit soon and make things much nicer. But 1.1 was apparently finished enough that Intel / Nokia felt good about giving it to journalists on a touchscreen tablet as a review unit.
Which was a mistake. I appreciate the netbook, but getting it functional has only served to convince me of how far MeeGo is from ready.
They hired a Bono impersonator
Seriously what the hell, guys? I don't know what surprised me more. That y'all felt a U2 cover band was the most universally acceptable music act for a convention in Dublin, Ireland. Or that you were right. Even the Germans liked it. But I can't forgive you for making me stare at what was essentially Bono's tomatoey balding forehead while hammered.
It was nauseating.
A Final Anecdote that Also Acts as a Biting Summation.
The 'free laptops' themselves played ringleaders to a carnival of error. First, Lenovo didn't ship enough. They had to turn back hundreds of us and beg for people to wait on the folks who wouldn't attend the third day. A lot of people stood in line anyway.
I don't blame them for lying.
A terrible, primal feeling takes o'er a man when a free netbook with a capacitive touchscreen is offered. It doesn't matter if he wants or needs such a product. All that matters is that he get it because holy cow free stuff!
Anyhow, I waited like a Good Little Boy. On Day #3, 500 un-netbooked people gathered in the President's Suite to receive our goodies. Each laptop came with a flash drive containing MeeGo 1.1 and either open source, or Broadcom WiFi drivers. While he was explaining the set-up process the Intel rep made an unfortunate phrasing choice: "You can either take the version with the open source drivers... or the version with the drivers that work."
Ever heard five hundred people groan at once? It sounds kind of like an elephant dying.
The rep ended his spiel with a plea to everyone receiving netbooks. Our end of the deal, it seemed, was to become evangelists for the operating system. To take our fancy tablets out into the world and convince our friends / fellow developers of MeeGo's greatness.
So I'll say this: I had fun hacking a working MeeGo OS together on my netbook. It came incomplete, so I had to hunt down pieces on my own and plug them in. I like doing that sort of crap because I am a huge nerd with lots of free time. Most People Aren't, and MeeGo doesn't have anything to recommend it to Most People.
As I walked out of the conference room, shiny new laptop under one arm, I heard variations of a single question echo up and down the hall.
From one nerd to another, "How long do you guess before all these machines are running Ubuntu?"
You imply that the cash thrown at the event produced nothing convincing. I'd say the MeeGo-powered netbook I'm typing this reply on says otherwise. Outside of a handful of expected bugs (which the fast-growing community has been hard at work resolving) I have found that MeeGo is, amazingly, meeting my productivity needs. Given that I tend to push the envelope even on Windows, that's impressive.
I find the hyperbole and severe cynicism in your assessment unwarranted. The overwhelming negative slant of the article tells me the reader that you were looking for failure and, failing to find anything to truly substantiate it, picked nits like a Bono impersonator to back that bias.
But I guess I see now why you ignored my request to attend our DFW MeeGo Network meetup tonight.
By the way, it's unfair of you to slam the hardworking folks at the conference for the netbook delivery delay (caused by bad weather, under no one's control of course) and accuse anyone of 'lying'.
This entire piece is irresponsible 'journalism' that I was surprised and disappointed to see. I got a much different impression of you from our brief meeting.
First off, I didn't "ignore" the invite. I haven't been back in the home state long enough to look forward to anything like that.
My assessment came from talking to dozens and dozens of people over the course of three days, the vast majority of whom were not optimistic about MeeGo's chances. It also came from my experiences in the Q&A's and interfacing with intel/nokia people.
I'm sorry the Bono joke offended you. TechEye tends to be a bit cheeky, and that was not meant as a serious spear in MeeGo's eye.
I made a point to state several times that survival and success is still possible. And, if you'd like to read any of my linked coverage in the article, you'll find that quite a lot of what I wrote about MeeGo was positive.
But that doesn't change the fact that, as a whole, I do not have high expectations for its success.
Severe cynicism comes with watching exciting start-ups and platforms boil up and die on a regular basis. Perhaps my judgment is clouded. Nothing would please me more than for that to be the case.
I enjoyed meeting you at the conference, and I hope you don't take anything I wrote as a personal sight against you.
I would even dare to say that Nokia will go further with their MeeGo "strategy" than you will do with such shallow comments.No offense.
But next time, try to find something worth sharing.
About you saying that people were not optimistic the number of Qt SDK downloads begs to differ.
Personally, I thought Ronan MacLaverty handled the talk well, engaged with the audience and answered *my* questions very well.
Android is, without a doubt, MeeGo's biggest competitor. Sure, MeeGo may have an advantage in terms of its different form factors (although currently only netbook, handset and IVI are targetted; all the tablets are home-grown, which is why the experience on the IdeaPad is so spotty); but Android has the momentum and MeeGo is coming from a standing start. But so did Android two and a half years ago - at the time, everyone said "pfft, how's Google going to compete with WinMob and the iPhone?" - now look a them. The argument made by the MeeGo execs is that we're still very early on in the mobile computing space; an opinion Microsoft and HP share. Do decry MeeGo because it wasn't finished two years ago is *remarkably* prescient. Can I have your prediction for this weekend's lottery numbers, please? :-)
If Android and iOS are the current blogosphere gizmotechnogadget-superstars, there is a huge number of Symbian, WebOS, Blackberry, Windows Mobile and dumbphone users, who haven't decided yet which will be their next smarthphone os. Tablet market is still young as Google isn't ready with its version of tablet UI, and in netbooks MeeGo has already proven to be faster and more energy efficient than Ubuntu's latest netbook version. (http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=meego_11_ubuntu1010&num=1)
Even though if I didn't quite find the plot of this article, it's was well written and - actually - pretty entertaining. However I still have the feeling, that the real facts and figures are missing, and all this is mostly based on the atmosphere with a pre-critical attitude. After having read many blogs and hundreds of Twitter messages about MeeGo Conference, I have to ask why _no-one_ else has written anything like Evans?
But, with a few days distance from the conference and a lot of thought, this is how I feel.
If you feel differently, write your own article and try to convince me/everyone else otherwise.
MeeGo is still on my tablet-book and I fully intend to follow the OS every step of its journey, wherever that leads. And I'll also write about every step of my journey. Because that's my job.
What is Qt ?
I'm not expecting much of it, except Netbook-lite; however, I do expect to have a lag-free video experience, the illusion that the CPU is highly reactive and a lengthy battery time. I also expect that one that will be recommended will run on Android/Arm.
Because I expect that a cheap mobile device will allow enough space for competing systems to gain a beach-head in the market, it may be too early to write it off; if to use the X-Box example, through enough resources at a problem, and you may prevail.
OTOH, to use the Itanium experience as an opposing example, technical and commercial developments may just over-run the perceived usefulness of your project, if you don't manage to gain an early critical threshold of adoption.
Personally, I don't hold any loyalty to a particular OS, but I'd bet that most people either like a user-friendly one which has all the trimmings, or one they are used to, which does what they expect it to - I know I do.
...except that most of them know it won't be Symbian, WebOS, Blackberry, or Windows Mobile.
You know the laptops were given out for multitouch devlopment work right?
Also, check out qt framework, Appup and ovi that will provide the app channel. Adobe also working close for flex devs.
As far as money goes, it probably wasn't a huge percentage of the budget. I heard the aviva conference facility was a good deal.
Another thing you need to think about:
what you see as Meego releases is a feature demonstrator. End products won't look anything like it.
Intel needs Meego for their new low-power platforms -its critical and will drive a lot of investment.
And finally. I thought the U2 cover band was superb!
Chippy
I understand your frustration about getting a half done OS for tablets or not having apps for it, but what you are missing IMHOhere is, that their are to big key players pushing this thingy, Intel and Nokia. They are doing this for the long run. Appliances are not only limited to Phones or Tablets, but also Netbooks and even car kits. You will never see iOS or WP7 on a car kit e.g., maybe Andoird would be suited for a car kit, but no one wants the restricivity which comes with it.
Also, the API for Meego isn't ready yet, but it will. Qt is pushing Qt Quick (QML) really hard atm. When this baby hit release stadium I guess things (and also opinions) will change.
The problem here is, Meego has emerged from a mix of phone + netbook OS, married with an API (Qt) and many many subsystems (Xorg etc) to become an alround Solution capable of doing various things on all diffrent kind of platforms.
Android, iOS and WP7, which you are comparing it with are developed with a much smaller focus, so it was easier for them, to become faster big.
I for myself am curious how it will evolve.
Keep in mind that e.g. Genivi Consortium has choosen Meego and not the others to make a reference platform for cars. There are 70 big industry names involved. None of them would choose doomed solution for a big kind of thing like this.
BR
Anes
What is Qt then? http://qt.nokia.com/products/platform/meego/
"There was shopping, there was drinking, there was football and there was more drinking"
Instead of doing that do some research before making claims that there isn't a framework.
Every second day someone bashes Nokia, do you guys get paid for it?
still, there is the Ovi Store; I guess maybe that's not hooked into Meego yet?
personally I can happily live without one; all the apps I actually need are in the maemo repo system and because that's a proper f/oss infrastructure with signing keys and code repos and a bug tracker the code tends to be of a lot higher quality than the bullshit I see all over the Android marketplace. But I recognize that's probably not going to work for most people, who really NEED that fart app that tells the NSA what websites they're visiting and mails their credit card details to Nigeria...
I think the author may have misunderstood the feedback from people at the conference. Everyone that I know who went came back pumped up about meego and meego development. A number of new people joined the IRC channel wanting to know how they could get involved in development as a response to whatever went on in the conference.
I also thinks the author fails to understand the importance of open development vs just open source. For example, because android is closed until google says so, phone OEMs are stuck with the-last-release to work with. This means that you still have android 2.1 phones being released weeks after 2.2 is released. Furthermore, customers don't like having to wait for updates for software that's already available. With MeeGo's open development policy, OEMs can develop phones with bleeding edge code and release a 1.2 phone the day (or shortly thereafter) that 1.2 is released as stable. Open development also means phone makers can take an active role in the direction and not have to wait to get things fixed or features to be added.
Sure, google could change their development policy to do the same, but it may take some meego pressure to prompt that change. However, something tells me google wants full control of the direction of android.
lets wait and see when nokia and meego ith the N9 is out for a couple of months, and we will see who is doomed =)
In future please try to review based on content at the conference instead of drunken conversations - it is what a professional would have done.
You mean, like the internet in its earlier days? Yeah, that never amounts to anything.
His development laptop didn't come with Photoshop
The conference was I think very well organised and run...then again I wasn't drinking as much as the author.
The venue was super and knowing the state of the Irish economy I am sure a good price was arranged for the Aviva Stadium (drinks and food as well) and the Guinness tour.
Its a bit unfair for the author to give such a negative view on a platform that is still in its embryonic stages which I am sure he is aware of. If he was starting a new venture I am sure he wouldn't like such negative press...doesn't help you know.
Why do we need another coffee shop or another car manufacturer or new clothes ranges....or cross platform operating system...because it pushes the boundaries or envelope...it means the competition has to up its game.
Meego is thinking outside the box or clear sky thinking. As the expression goes we'll (in this case Nokia) get them in the long grass....
As Gaveen from the Meego Forum put so well...
MeeGo is not vendor dictated. MeeGo is not a sole property of Nokia and Intel and some others. It's an Open Source project governed by the Linux Foundation. Therefore it's not dictated by the business needs of a single vendor. This fact needs to be emphasized given how Tech media seems to be giving the false impression that MeeGo is the product built for Nokia/Intel needs-only. MeeGo runs on multiple target environments. Which means MeeGo brings some level of cross platform functionality and compatibility to end users as well as developers. This common experience across different device markets is definitely a fresh change.
And of course this was written on my Lenovo netbook.
PS. You can use photoshop online here http://www.photoshop.com/tools
These are the current numbers of forum.meego.com
Currently Active Users: 69 (4 members and 65 guests)
Periodic sampling do confirm +/- this trend.
Most users ever online was 287, 27-05-10 at 11:34 PM.
Threads: 2,138, Posts: 15,106, Members: 18,055
And I'm puzzled ... is this a living community/OS?!
Please, as an esercise, monitor the website/forum/wiki and report back on Meego health.
I do wonder if the installed base of happy N900 users will hinder maemo phone takeup.
Of course intel, amd have a long way to go in SoC, low power consumption, built in gpu. Don't forget many were writing off apple many times, before they became worth more than microsoft. Lack of applications is a problem, with the right tools though porting ios/android apps may not be that difficult.
There's lots of emulation, x86 is mostly RISC, with an x86 header. Software is mostly object oriented and can run on different kernels with shells interfacing it.
Lets not call the author of this article a drunk, his opinion is as valid as our own in a free market of ideas/press.
Maybe you should have been drinking a bit less and listened on the conference...
If Meego can do the same, it will be another Symbian foundation mess.
It is 2011 - OEMs don't want to bother piecing together an OS when Android is free and complete and WP7 comes with tons of incentives and support.
In the end, like Symbian, Meego will be just a Nokia thing, slow to evolve and will be marginalized.
Meego will provide no advantage whatsoever to the end user.
It provides more challenges than advantages to OEMs.
Meego is just Nokia's wet dream of maintaining control.
I hope it succeeds, as I think it is a better platform than Android, but I'm afraid it is simply too little, too late.
I am slightly biased being an N900 owner with 'an already near death experience' operating system. The sad thing is I still love my N900 and maemo but Nokia have gone from maemo to meego to WM7 during the 12 months I've had the thing. I feel I can't trust anything they say anymore.
Meanwhile my wife's iPhone 3GS does exactly what it says on the tin, and yes I hate it for it. The closed source, the iTunes experience the whole nine yards of it but let's be honest, Apple have got it right with the mass market. The seamless MS Exchange corporate email just worked within a few minutes. Even despite the furore with the iPhone 4 they are still selling well.
Despite the obvious android offerings and the dedicated corporate Blackberry users Nokia might just pull it off with WM7 as long as whatever is delivered is delvierd soon and ACTUALLY WORKS PROPERLY. However will I be going the Nokia hardware route again? No chance...
10 out of 10
A big problem was that most non tech savvies hadn't even heard of Meego. Everyone knows what an iPhone is, most people are at least aware of Android phones, if not what a phone OS is, anda lot of people know Windows P7 or Blackberry is in option, but despite the fact pre smartphone everyone has owned at least one nokia, usually more, meego and symbian are words for the Nokia initiated and tech savvy.
That may not be an issue for the supporters here, but doesn't help drive sales to joe public in the phone shop asking whether he should by the apple or the google one.