Linux on the desktop is unlikely because it is too interesting -

Celebrating Linux's anniversary, inventor Linus Torvalds has admitted that the reason that his operating system never made it big on the desktop was because that market was too interesting.

Speaking to LinuxFRhe admitted that the desktop so special and so much harder than any other market because it was more interesting and people do so many different things.

Linux has done well on the server. However the server does almost nothing, says Torvalds.

It might have a lot of CPU power, a fast network, and lots of IO, but it does the same limited thing over and over again.

It may be important, but it's not a very varied workload, and it's not something people are attached to, he said.

However a desktop is what you see every day, and you get attached to it. The attachment might be some kind of "Stockholm syndrome", but even then it becomes a kind of dependency where you get used to it and rely on it rather more intimately than you ever end up relying on the company mainframe, Torvalds said.

People do much more on their desktop. They play games on it, do word processing on it, and development. It is not a one trick pony.

Torvalds said that he did not think there was much he could do to the Linux kernel that would make the operating system popular on the desktop.

Android has done a lot to create mainstream users for Linux, but the problem is that the desktop is a difficult market to reach.

He said that there are huge amounts of "network effects" where having existing users is a big reason to retain them and get more new users.

Most people do not want to change their environment, and if they do switch, they want help and support. That support is not about commercial support, it is about asking the bloke next to you, Torvalds said. To get over that hump you need wide scale adoption.