When the London Stock Exchange (LSE) went caput early November last year there were whispers of sabotage. A report in The Times suggests that, yes, there was dirty work afoot.
"Make no mistake, the UK's critical infrastructure is under attack. The threat is advanced and persistent," an insecurity expert said to The Times. You may or may not remember other stories on TechEye last year which suggested that it's not just that we have been under attack, rather that we are constantly under attack: and only some of what you hear about, the tip of the iceberg, will surface in reports.
Distributed Denial of Service attacks have, in particular, been in the news thanks to the efforts of Anonymous and anti-Anonymous groups over the Wikileaks support fiasco. It is a relatively easy attack to perform and, as we reported, if there is a common cause summoning the collective outrage of any particular group to download a program and point it at a target can wreak havoc.
Similarly, a cyber security expect with clearance at high levels revealed to us that Western governments have long been considering cyber warfare. "You would be a fool," our deepthroat said to us, "to think that governments are not considering the applications for cyber warfare."
Another confirmed that attacks on hospitals and power grids are likely. "Hospitals and other medical facilities operate under a very different regulatory framework than in other industries."
If that's the case - is it any wonder that "hacktivists" working through some far-flung proxy may be launching attacks on stock exchanges? After all - this is the heart of financial activity.
Last year, the US government's Homeland Security secretary thought a return to the Mutually Aided Destruction, or M.A.D model of the cold war, makes sense in cyberspace.
Michael Chertoff believes that world governments need to work on technologies to ward off attacks from elsewhere. Indeed - India was the first country to publicly take a step in geopolitical cyber defence. It announced that it has been gathering homegrown talent with the capabilities to fight off attacks - and more crucially, go on the offensive, too.
Should we be alarmed? Maybe - the world is increasingly moving toward data as one of its greatest assets as the digital revolution keeps our money in computerised stocks and numbers over bullion. But should we be surprised? Probably not. The Times' scoop is that it has confirmed attacks have happened. They were probably only a few of many.
The press at the time suggested it might have been a disgruntled contractor who had worked on the outgoing microsoft technology system that is being replaced.
Did you do any research at all for this article?
The company who provide the new system based on a red hat / oracle 'unbreakable linux' setup are MillenniumIT, who were bought by the London Stock Exchange as a strategic acquisition.
http://www.londonstockexchangegroup.com/newsroom/2009-press-releases/lseg-to-acquire-milleniumit-for-us30m-18m.htm
http://v.gd/MgceAn
Nov.23 - - -Nov.26 th. 2010.
The following sent to - - - - 312- - Lords - - - - - - House of Lords. ( Inc. Lord Myners.)
The following sent to - - - - 649 - - M.P.'s - - - - - House of Commons.
SWISS BANK PARTNERS IN CRIMES.
Pictet & Cie Bank.
Ivan Pictet.
Charles Pictet.
Nicolas Pictet.
Jacques de Saussure.
Jean – Francois Demole.
Renaud de Planta.
Philippe Bertherat..
Pictet & Cie.- claim they are the “Rolls Royce”of Swiss banks.
Swiss Banks or more correctly Swizz banks.
Swizz. ---- “ a great disappointment.” or a “ fraud.”
Fraud. ---“ an intentional deception or dishonesty.”— “a crime.”
Crime. ---“ an act committed or omitted in violation of a law.”
Serious Crimes .
Conspiring to pervert the Course of Justice.
Perverting the Course of Justice.
Contempt of Court.
Pictet & Cie Bank –Partners –(1996—2011)---guilty.
Peters &Peters – Partners.— (1999---2011)--- guilty.
The bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld crucial documents requested under a High Court order. The bank and it’s officials/lawyers deliberately withheld evidence from the Police, and one of it’s account managers Susan Broadhead gave a false witness statement to the Police.
Another one of it’s managers Nicholas Campiche ( Now Head of Pictet – Alternative Investments.) concocted a letter pretending to be a client and closed his account. The senior partner (Ivan Pictet.) sought to have numerous documents destroyed,along with those copies held in their London office’s of Pictet Asset Management. Initially stating that they were forgeries then their lawyers Peters & Peters – Monty Raphael –and the barrister Charles Flint.Q.C. later had to admit in Court that the documents were genuine.
British Parliament. Hansard .29th March 2007.
Barry Sheerman .M.P.—quote.
---------“ Constituents of mine have lost £2 million through fraud. The fraudster used Pictet & Cie - - a French Bank - - and Pictet Asset Management to back the fraud being perpetrated.””
(1) It is a criminal offence for a bank to knowingly act for an undischarged criminal bankrupt in so far as it seeks to assist that criminal bankrupt in the fraudulent movement of monies. ( Money Laundering.)
(2) It is a criminal offence for a bank to lie to the police and the bankrupts trustee in bankruptcy in so far as any knowledge of, or dealings with the bank was refuted .
(3) A bank can be guilty of Contempt of Court if it fails to comply fully with the Courts order for discovery .
(4) The banks contempt is further compounded if it fails to address its error after it is specifically drawn to the to its solicitors attention. ( Monty Raphael).
(5) It is a criminal offence under the Financial Services Act to seek to destroy evidence that might be relevant to an investigation .
(6) It is a criminal offence not to relinquish control of funds to the Trustee immediately the fact of the bankruptcy is drawn to the banks attention.
(7) It is a criminal offence to lie or otherwise obfuscate the lawful and proper enquiries of the F.S.A.
In the F.S.A. cover up , they concluded that there had been “ Rogue” elements in Pictet & Cie’s , London operations . They had been moved from their London Office so who was there left to prosecute. “ Unbelievable.”
On Dec 9th,2008. the complaint was sent to 150 Members of the House Of Lords and 230 Members of Parliament.
*** We thank --David Cameron. M.P. ( Canary Wharf Speech.) Dec. 15th. 2008.
Now--- PRIME MINISTER.
(1) Bankers who behave irresponsibly should face professional consequences.
(2) If anyone is found to have behaved criminally they must be prosecuted.
(3) The F.S.A and the Serious Fraud Office should be following up every lead,
investigating every suspect transaction .
(4) We need to make it 100% clear –those who break the law should face
prosecution.
(5) That we make sure we root out any wrongdoing that may have happened, whoever
is involved, however high or well connected they may be.
Ivan Pictet.
Managing partner in Pictet & Cie Bank . --- retiring -?. 2010.
President of the Geneva Financial Centre. ---stepping down -2010. ?
World Bank.committee member.---- ?
United Nations. Investment Committee member,
Vice President – Global Humanitarian Forum. --- redundant.2010.?
Member of the Henokiens.
Blackstone Group --- Board Member.
Past- President – Geneva Private Bankers association.
Past –President – Geneva Chamber of Commerce and Industry.
Monty Raphael. ( Peters & Peters.)
Quote.” ---- Doyen of U.K. Fraud lawyers.
Head of Fraud and Regulatory Dept. ---- stepping down, --2009.? Director of the Fraud Advisory panel.
Member of the Law Society of England & Wales.
International Bar Association Member.
Written Parliamentary Questions received by the table office ..
(1) To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to ensure that Swiss Banks such as Pictet & Cie do not evade criminal prosecution under EU law even when the illegal act is committed by a London based subsidiary.
(2)To ask the secretary of state what steps he is taking to protect the rights of UK citizens who seek redress following criminal activities by Swiss banks with subsidiary offices located in London.
On Dec 9th,2008. the complaint was sent to 150 Members of the House Of Lords and 230 Members of Parliament.
On Aug 19th.2009.another complainants file regarding the “cover up” was forwarded to the same 380 members.
We started our campaign in June 2008 -- via the “net” to highlight our fight to get “justice”. In our second year campaign we hoped to reveal further damning evidence . Due to there being an on going Police investigation into our complaint we are at this moment unable to place dozens of documents on to the “net”. Again we thank other “ E- Mailers” for their information in relation to our campaign.
Quote. ( America’s Top Lawyer .)
You can be the richest man in the world with the best lawyers that money can buy but you cannot win against a man who has got nothing left to lose and is telling the truth.
Truth Hurts.
Ivan Pictet. Announces stepping down from Pictet & Cie. 5th Feb 2010.
Stepping Down—President of Geneva Financial centre.—2010.
Monty Raphael. Steps down as head . May. 2009.
*** We note that there has been a sharp increase in Peters & Peters partners leaving to go to other practices. Moving does not alleviate them of any responsibility from any illegalities that may have occurred at Peters & Peters during their partnership tenure. From 1999 onwards.
*** Were currently waiting to see if the Police and other Law Enforcement Bodies attempt to cover this case up like their F.S.A. counterparts. If they do –“ then watch this space.”
We were informed that due to pressure from our M.P. that the Ministry of Justice have asked Lord Myners to investigate our claims that the F.S.A. covered up the illegal activities of Pictet Asset Management. London. It has been noted that the book launch
for PICTET was held at Lord Myners Belgravia home.We might as well have asked Ivan Pictet to investigate our complaint.-or someone from FRIENDS RE-UNITED.
Lady Myners on Prix PICTET advisory board.
The consensus of opinion is the Pictet & Cie should be prosecuted , and that their U.K. banking licence should be taken away.
Their Solicitors at Peters & Peters .London “ struck off and prosecuted..”
*** Started campaign --- June 6th.2008.
2 .5 years ---- approx 2 .5 million e-mails - - - but still no writs, injunctions or threats of litigation - - - WHY - - - because it is all true.
*** . The bigger they are --- the harder they fall.!!!
In America ---- they would have all been in prison for the last seven years.
Nov.23rd --Nov.26th. 2010 .
The above sent to ------ 312 - - Lords - - - House of Lords.( Inc. Lord Myners.)
The above sent to --- --649 - - M.P.'s - - - House of Commons._
Full Story.
Go to search box on “Google” and insert ( Peters & Peters/ Pictet & Cie.)
or go to " Google " and insert any of the following combinations.
Insert-- ( Jacques de Saussure/ Monty Raphael.)
Insert-- ( Ivan Pictet / Monty Raphael.)
Insert-- ( Pictet & Cie /Monty Raphael.)
Insert-- ( Charles Flint. Q.C./ Monty Raphael.)
Insert-- ( Nicholas Campiche / Susan Broadhead.)
Insert-- ( F.S.A. / Monty Raphael.)
Insert --( F.S.A. / Pictet & Cie.)
Insert --( Hansard /Ivan Pictet.)