A study commissioned by ViewSonic has come up with the astonishing conclusion that women don’t flirt as much using mobile devices because they can’t bat their eyelashes via text.
“Women have always been considered the bigger flirts,” according to ViewSonic. A third of men aged between 18-34 said that smartphones make it easier to flirt, compared to 21 percent of women.
According to Viewsonic: “Women flirt primarily by batting their eyelashes, though, which does not translate well in a virtual environment. However men find the Internet a more comfortable environment in which to flirt. The research also found that more than half (53%) of women with a Smartphone or Tablet claim that they do not flirt with the opposite sex at all.” James Coulson, Euro marketing manager at Viewsonic, did not say whether he flirted by batting his eyelashes.
Men, apparently, find it far easier to flirt over the internet presumably because they don’t have the right kind of eyelashes.
YouGov surveyed 2,064 adults in the UK.
A woman called Sharon Kell said that men are far more into technology and gadgets. “Flirting through a device is seen to be less risky than flirting in person.” She is the managing director of www.cocomoon.co.uk. She did not say whether she flirted by batting her eyelashes.
Femininity uses the heart, which coincidentally, is situated on the left, one’s left being only 2 inches left of the centre, whilst masculinity uses the liver, which coincidentally is slightly to the right. One stands for inactivity [or so deemed Quackery] and the other activity. When it comes to the emotionality of “flirting”, oka “juicing it up”, the heart is the centre of the [in]activity. One might emote towards one’s saviour[ship] as in the purchase of an iThingy because of its associativity/ies, but unless one’s saviour happens to be the target of one’s “juicing it up”, it doesn’t work/has no relevancy.
In short, an object will only come alive, metaphorically as well as in imagination, when its beholder confers it his life/essence of the living, gadget makers/takers ought to realise before spending all that ill-gotten gains. Just because some firmware is able to mimic the effect of, say, “scrolling”, doesn’t mean it is really scrolling. Only when its intended victim/target/nut perceives so, will then the advertising/mesmerising be justified. Give this scrolling effect/trick to anyone who is truly alive, and he’ll junk the nonsense [but watch who “wowee’s” over the scrolling, and the essence behind all that fluttering is revealed - status and creed included, especially “presidents” who tried to hide his cravings but when the excuse was found/afforded, he’s in like a shot - for the sake of the country/entrepreneurialship, you know …].
All have masculinity and femininity within and all are able call upon these services/states when desired-demanded. When a person is armed with his femininity/in his feminine suit, he will only react positively/emote when the object is alive although there will be those who will emote towards an object but that then is sliding into the realm of worship, oka Fatal Attraction. In short, when an object is merely an object, femininity has no means of batting an eyelid towards. On the other hand, when an object is an object, that becomes a convenient tool for masculinity, masculinity being to own whereas femininity is one of being owned. When a human has no means of realising his obejct of worship, he’ll turn into his alterego [state] and start trying to own the one he is trying to worship. Emotionality/conditioning needs a response or else the emotional/conditioned will turn into something of full imagination whereas when we/the-ego treat others as an object/the living-dead, we are turning others into an imagination. The former develops nervous illnesses, oka “Guilt”, and the latter develops cardiovascular illnesses, oka “Anger”.