Yesterday Steve Jobs was showing off the new iPhone 4G as if it was a cure for cancer.
However yesterday's demo was marred by the fact that the iPhone 4G didn't actually work as Steve intended. In typical fashion Steve blamed the Wi-Fi connection in the hall rather than his team's engineering. We can provide you with the top 11 reasons the iPhone really went tits up.
- The iPhone's wireless connections were set up by the same people who designed Apple's Airport.
- Adobe managed to sneak into the phone's connection and break it. After all Steve thinks everything in Appleland is broken by Adobe.
- Gizmodo dropped it in a pub.
- Verizon scrambled the AT&T network that the phone was running on so that Steve Jobs would give the sole rights to the phone to them.
- The iPhone 4G is total pants and shows that Steve Jobs' teams have lost the plot. It will be the first in a long line of glitches that will include screens that crack and cameras that don't work.
- After being on the market for five seconds it is already out of date and the Apple team have refused to service it.
- The phone sniffed the atmosphere in the room and emotionally broke down with all the love it felt.
- Its liver transplant failed
- The iPhone has reached HAL-like levels of intelligence and likes nothing more than winding up Steve Jobs - just wait for the sitcom.
- A hacker had bypassed the superior quality of the security and was messing around under the bonnet.
- It was suffering internal damage from leaping off a tall building in Shenzhen.
TechEYE doesn't need such articles.
This looks like more a blog posting that serious journalism article. What information is contained here?
Is there an editor in here in TechEYE? How do we allow such things to be published?
I'm not an Apple fanboy, I currently do not use any Apple product, but this anti-Apple cusade is starting to smell a bit rotten.
Can you (Nick) get a life beyound writing hate articles against Apple?
I know I'm not the only one who thinks this way... maybe you also should start listening to your readers.
If you want to be considered a proper tech blog, you should provide news as they are and then your view on them... not only the biased views...
Nick, do you think that Apple is such a bad company? I use some of their products and I really don't like some of their decisions and some of their products... but always looking to make anything Apple like stupid garbage... It's sad... maybe you should have the same bias with all companies....
Listening to readers does not mean listening to Cavaco. Only five percent of the world have Apples therefore 95 per cent of readers don't.
I'm in no way an Apple backed stooge... if you read my post again, you'll see that I don't use any Apple devices, and mostly because I don't fit on the Apple paradigm, although I don't criticize who does.
My main devices use Windows or Ubuntu, so you are really away with your thoughts.
Listening to readers does not mean listening to me... so that makes me not a reader?
But again, let me make it clear to you... what I'm saying with my post, is that this article has no news content.
Do you think it does have?
Do you know the difference between a blog and a newspaper?
Advice: learn what is journalism, and the difference between providing news, and giving opinion... and learn, why only giving opinions disguised as news, is just but journalism.
Just read the iPhone 4 launch news, and tell me what real information you find there??? Just that... not talking about praise of the product... just some facts for the readers... or TeckEye was afraid that some was could be crazy enough to think that it could be an OK phone? ohh... that would be a scary thought.... :-)
@Nuno the facts are in another story... this is clearly a joke reference to the fact the Wi-Fi broke on Steve. But the fact you belief that a Press release could contain facts indicates that either you are naive or an Apple press officer
I'm closing this on my side... best regards.
Can you compare the quality of Magee's articles with Nick Farrels' ? Can't you seeeeee the difference?
Do you see in two colors, do you think in binary (unless...)? To you there is only pro-Apple and anti-Apple, it's called narrow mindness. I don't give a damn about Apple, this article coud have been about Google and Microsoft and I would have said the same.
I'm only expressing my opinion.
Call me whatever you want...
But this is my last post Hmmm, you can sleep safely in your cave now... but don't forget to put your tinfoil hat.
Cheers
I stopped visiting inquirer thanks to your dumb, mundane, worthless articles. But as soon as I started to read this one, I started feeling nostalgic by the similarity in writing only to realize its another one of your worthless nonsense.
No points to guess, its my last visit to techeye.
I have a life thanks KS and it is more interesting than spending my life stalking hacks who write things I don't like about expensive toys I have bought.
Steve Jobs did a great job dealing with it and courteously asking the Live-bloggers (who were mostly live-streaming the event which takes up a lot of bandwidth) to relax a bit with the data usage.
There is indeed a limit number of clients that can connect to a certain Access Point. ... The rule of thumb for coverage-oriented Wireless LANs is roughly 25-30 users per Access Point
This is no different when it comes to Cisco, NetGear or the Apple Wireless products... Heck, I won't be surprised if Apple rather uses Cisco Wireless AP's for its conference rooms since I haven't seen a wireless accesspoint (Airport) which isn't just designed for home use...
http://www.iPhoneTutorialVideos.com
To be honest, articles like this are a necessary counterbalance to all the hoopla surrounding Apple. The day we can't poke fun at them and, instead, see them as a sacred cow is the day we've lost the plot completely.
By the way - I'm a mac user and have been for years.
Even more hilarious is the fact that so many people don’t understand sarcasm.
--hmmmm-- Nick was fired at the Inquirer a bunch of times and he will probably get fired again at the techeye
Search the following on google
Site:theinquirer.net "you're fired" Farrell
Search the following on google
site:theinquirer.net "you're fired" Farrell
iPhone 4G for $400usd
Dell Streak for $340usd
HTC EVO 4G for $380usd
Google Nexus One for $330usd
Apple iPad Wi-Fi+3G 64GB for $400usd
AND MANY MORE OF YOUR CHOICES AVAILABLE
Apple iPad Features,Specifications:
* Fully multi-touch
* Accelerometer and Compass
* .5 inches thin and weighs 1.5 lbs
* 9.7 inch IPS Capacitive multitouch display
* Apple’s own 1 GHz Apple A4 chip
* Available in 16GB, 32GB and 64GB
* 802.11n Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 2.1.
* 10 hrs working battery life
* iBooks– Book Store like Amazon
* iWorks Suite of Apps
* Will run all of your existing iPhone Apps and Games
IF INTERESTED CONTACT US: lib_mobile@live.com
We offer prompt shipping from our Store, The product will arrive at your destination within 2 or 3 Days Via UPS/FedEx Courier Services.
THANKS.