The Lord Judge has said that modern technology is out of control, possibly after mistaking Terminator 2 for a documentary.
What he refers to is social media, in particular Twitter, seemingly making a mockery of the much maligned superinjunction.
A regular injunction often leaves room for reporters to write up a case albeit under anonymity - for example, "A footballer did a thing." The superinjunction, however, puts a stop to journalists or publications even reporting that an injunction has taken place, with swift penalties in store for anyone found in breach.
The problem is a judge does not have much control to stop people doing or saying what they like online. Lawmen can lean on services to crack down on users and there have been cases where Twitter has been forced to hand over user details in the past.
Lord Judge, the Guardian says, thinks modern technology is totally out of control, in particular with people who "peddle lies" using the net. A recent report from a judicial committee says that superinjunctions must be granted in "very" limited circumstances, and they must not last long. While the report does not mention Twitter, the Lord Judge reckons "anybody can put anything on such sites". Which is kind of the point.
Jemima Khan was one celebrity who was called out by a Twitter account on a superinjunction that didn't exist. She had, however, filed for another superinjunction which was turned down.
But his fear is those with genuine court orders for protection are "at the mercy of modern technology." The argument against is it's generally the wealthy who can afford to go to court with superinjunctions anyway.
Regulating the internet is a dangerous game and, frankly, not very possible without walking down the censorship route which leaves a bad taste in the mouth. Meanwhile the Press Complaints Commission is investigating the idea of regulating journalists who use Twitter as if they had a by-line in the newspaper.
That said, the idea that modern technology is "out of control" is not a silly one.
Perhaps it should be applied to monopolistic technology giants with fingers in every pie, who lobby governments across the world to curry favour, rather than debating who's had an affair with whom and the implications of Twitter.
Friday, May 20, 2011
ATOMIC TYPO OF THE WEEK - NEWSWEEK, MAY 23 & 30 issue
UPDATE: - ''Hi. Thanks for the correction and the many messages. I don't write the headlines. If you've let the editors know it should be corrected. Thank you. '' -- [Allison Samuels, Newsweek Daily Beast writer]
ATOMIC TYPO OF THE WEEK - NEWSWEEK, MAY 23 & 30 issue
atomic typos are typos that spellcheck cannot find because the words are spelled correctly but they
are in the wrong tense or used incorrecetly
headline of article by Allison Samuels
I SURVIVED
subhead contains the ''atomic typo'' - [PLEASE CORRECT ONLINE, ALLISON!]
When Magic Johnson famously announced he has HIV, it wasn't clear how long he'd live.
see it yet? should be, had, past tense, not has, present tense. Corrected below:
When Magic Johnson famously announced he HAD HIV, it wasn't clear how long he'd live.
http://www.newsweek.com/2011/05/15/magic-johnson-20-years-of-living-with-hiv.html
I Survived
When Magic Johnson famously announced he has HIV, it wasn't clear how long he'd live. Twenty years later, he tells of his struggles, fears, and triumphs.
Allison, hi......sorry if i was not clear...i am a reporter too...I
am on YOUR side, i know you don't write the heads or the subheads,
i am longtime newspaper editor in USA and Japan.....so I
am not blaming YOU...but it has your byline, so i wrote you.
Sadly, the NEWSWEEEK editors do not respond to me at all. period,
zero....NADA.......so i had to go this route to bring this TYPO
to the attention of the copy desk at NEWSWEEK, who never replies to
readers. they treat us like you now what......but i care...
so if you can pass this message on to the real editors, please do...
again, i am not blaming YOU for the typo.....in fact, you wrote a
great story on MJ and the editors sort of ruined it by letting that
small yet very visible TYPO go unchecked and even now it remains
online ....can you ask some there to fix it later...for the archives?
thanks....danny bloom, ,,,,on YOUR side....i am a reporter, i love
editors too......but i hate typos that are not corrected even after
the fact
and i make typos all the time...i am not pointing fingers...i am
trying to clean things up.....GOOD IDEA?
cc: editors, NEWSWEEk