David "one is an ordinary bloke" Cameron is so in touch with the voting public he believes that an automatic ban on internet porn will win him the next erection, sorry, election.
The man who leaves his kid in a pub thinks that children will be safer if porn is auto-banned in the UK.
Under Cameron's cunning plan, when you sign up for an internet account, you will have to confess to the nice young woman at the call centre that you really want to use your connection to see porn. It is not clear if you have to specify what sort of porn you want.
Cameron's idea is that no gentleman would do such a thing, and people will be too embarrassed to opt in.
Cameron's crack team of expense fiddlers, or ministers as he likes to call them, are suggesting that the great unwashed should automatically be barred from accessing unsuitable adult material unless they actually choose to view it.
Also banned will be sites that promote suicide, anorexia, self-harm, talking about MP's expenses and voting Labour. Actually, we made the last two up, but given that you will never know what a Tory minister thinks the list could be anything from terrorists to Jeremy Paxman.
Of course, this censorship is being done under the idea that they are somehow protecting kids from paedophiles. This is a blanket cry for everything stupid that the government does these days. We suspect that PR spinners have already packaged the U-turn on the 3p fuel duty rise and the subsequent mauling by Paxo on the telly as caused by a rise in paedophilia in the UK.
Tory MP Claire Perry is doing her best to make the restrictions happen. She is spinning this under the title "active choice".
Like most terrible ideas this one comes from the puritan United States. There it is called the "Nudge" theory which means that people will do as they are told if a truly open internet was made tricky to get. We think the term comes from Monty Python because it means you will have to ring up your local ISP and say "I would like an internet connection, nudge, nudge, wink, wink".
BT, TalkTalk, Virgin Media and Sky have reluctantly signed up to a code of practice, offering customers a choice of whether to apply filters. But it is entirely optional.
The strange thing is that ministers know that such technology is not effective. The Pirate Bay proved that people can still get hold of banned sites if they want to.
Children's minister Tim Loughton told the BBC parents do not feel in control of what their families are exposed to online. They want to take responsibility, but they find the technology too difficult, or their kids are too bright and ignore them.
Loughton said that automatic filtering risks lulling parents into a false sense of security and thinks that the answer lies in finding ways to combine technical solutions with better education. Of course, since the education cuts, the chances of kids getting a better education is unlikely.
PM David Cameron said that he wanted to explore every option that might help make children safer. In his case that might mean either chaining his child to his wrist or leaving his child in the pub permanently so that it is not psychologically scarred by having Cameron for a dad, who thinks it is a good idea to ban porn.
The aim of The Singularly Natured, being of principle and never of concept, a concept being of Thoughts of The Past vs Thoughts of The Future, because He-She is Of Permanence and therefore never need to repeat other than being of constancy like The Sun, say, is to show/highlight/offer-contrast-to [but never teaching because Permanency is Unconditonality, oka True Love] the dual natured Human and our so-called Humanity that when we lack permanency [of Construction/Evolution], not only will we then be of Destruction/Devolution, we will then need to repeat whatever we do because then, everything then is the cycling between Pro & Con, Good & Bad, For & Against, Hydrogen & Oxygen, Carb & Protein, Past & Future [oka "Time"], Fear & Greed, Guilt & Anger, Right & Wrong ["Rightists", oka The Fathering Mothers and the{ir} Mothering Fathers be conscious and then be aware], Cunning & Cruelty, Covert & Overt, The Kinetic & The Potential, Law Enforcement & The Judiciary, Femininity & Masculinity and the myriad of existences all [will have to] go through in order to "Succeed" and "Survive", oka To Exist only for Fame, Fortune & Immortality.
To journey on a cycle is to be circuitously repetitive and in this learning phase, as a reminder of one's status quo, we need to repeat everything that we do from breathing, consuming, eliminating, physically being born, physically dying, elation, depression, and that biggy which eludes almost all [with 99.99% being generous to a fault], to repeat one's good behaviour and one's misbehaviour. Afterall, every Beggar-cum-Thief like, say, a "Politician", has to stop begging or thieving when he is out glitzing/"electioneering" or whilst visiting the toilet if not whilst amourously embracing a rent boy/girl. As such, the real destructiveness of that Tentacle of The Bookie, Religion & Religiosity, is to condemn those who'd realised that they have erred, to be repetitively erring. Afterall, the Love within all is an undestructable principle and not some concept/thought aborted from The Bookie. It is like pinning those of guilt into a corner which then forces them to resort to the only weaponry that they have, anger, the duty of Anger being to realise/slipstream Guilt [and vice-versa], Anger being guilt expressed with Guilt being Anger suppressed. This is why some will blindly take others' with them on their final journey into Frustration/Inequity/Injustice. Hands up those who do not realise this. You must be the Tag-Along of The Tentacles of The Bookie or perhaps even a Chosen Few. Hello - again.
This is why the contemporary Fav of Guilt, oka "The West", is to finger point at others and never, ever, at self. This Saint whom no one ever knows, will succeed in controlling its "Majority" if only because a Control Freak is the driver/slipstreamer of its Abandonment, Control being Abandoment suppressed with Abandonment being none other but Control expressed. A politician, oka The Beggar-cum-Thief, like any other human is, firstly and lastly, doing it for himself because no one breathes for another. As such, the difference between Joe Private and Joe Public is that the latter claims to be breathing for others. Then, the point is not that another Beggar-Thief is on the loose but how many worshippers will offer sanctuary within their insanity to such saviours, Finger-Pointing being about self and never, ever, about another in-reality/Reality. Why is it so mandated? Because the problem with Humanity is that every self wants to be another for seemingly obvious/Sado-Maso reason [of The Dichotomy] with the real reason being darker than dark, there being no such thing as Absolute Destruction - yet.
The Tentacles of The Bookie might be partying on as usual but that is because their future/myth has long been assured/mapped-out. Insanity is when those, whose future is truly Joyuous, elect to be so limited in their ability to accommodate Intelligence, preferring their Subjectivity/Ecstasy and Objectivity-Projectivity/Euphorias instead. Almost all are partially blind/blinded/sighted but some will gain full vision for Joy if [there is] nothing else. This Kumming Of Kameron joker might have graduated to being The Court Jester, but he is merely stepping on the shoes of a long line of the partially blinded claiming hindsight, insight and foresight. Just the sound of it deserves one's vote, of course, seeing with the ears being the magic the limited [and the lowest 5] human senses offer, 25/8 if poss, please. Wisdom does not mean age-ism, it means Innocence, which real children and real adults have proven, has no time limit/is not of time but The Timing. Popularity is meaningless otherwise The Divine will not only be seemingly invisible to The ElectroMagnetic, oka The Material Dimension, He will, through She, be materially visible just like that. The Principle of Materialism therefore is to alert those so trapped by the glitz of materialism that being materialistic, which includes saviourship-worship, might be polular, but it will lead to a dead end much like the inability for The Material to fathom what The Infinite when peering into the sky.
Ju own that?
You WANKER! fudge, fudge, wank, wank.
You don't like the Madonna, much?
No. Lourdes, it is always all about the yin and the yang with you and The Bookie gotta beef it -
oka the naked singularity implying that the cosmic censorship hypothesis does not hold you up. Its all about your treatises on how you juxtaposed your naked singularity, Dave, fanny how you go on like that... You should keep yer John Locke SHET. As you fancy yourself a doctor of spin, the shism of the ism, the gist of the shist, being none other than tea-bagging the Techeye. Why must we be a party to yer Sadomasochistic obsession slavery? Have you no modesty, repetitvely erring us over, as you do? Wag oka wag wag, whenging like a banshee: "Oh I'm on the path to besting The West, you know, 'cause I'ma Singularly Divine, init?"
You got me a car, it's as big as a whale
And we're headin' on down to the Love Shack. Sign says "Stay away, fools" Any who will doo. Who heir? Whose air? Huggin' and a-kissin' Dancin' and a-lovin' Wearin' next to nothin' 'Cause it's hot as an oven. Sheik Sheik on the floor baby Sikh Sikh.
Quoting Locke'd:
IF man in the state of nature be so free, as has been said; if he be absolute lord of his own person and possessions, equal to the greatest, and subject to no body, why will he part with his freedom? Why will he give up this empire, and subject himself to the dominion and control of any other power? To which it is obvious to answer, that though in the state of nature he hath such a right, yet the enjoyment of it is very uncertain, and constantly exposed to the invasion of others: for all being kings as much as he, every man his equal, and the greater part no strict observers of equity and justice, the enjoyment of the property he has in this state is very unsafe, very unsecure. This makes him willing to quit a condition, which, however free, is full of fears and continual dangers: and it is not without reason, that he seeks out, and is willing to join in society with others, who are already united, or have a mind to unite, for the mutual preservation of their lives, liberties and estates, which I call by the general name, property. (2nd Tr., §123)
Yeah right. Just don't do it here, mate.
Did they learn NOTHING from WW2?