.jpg "Intel to push Sandy Bridge -")
Intel wants to move its Sandy Bridge chips on the desktop market even more quickly than expected.
Already the outfit's move to the 32nm manufacturing process and Nehalem/Westmere micro-architecture products has been going like the clappers, but X-Bit claims that the transition to will be even more rapid.
Intel has said that it wants ship the Sandy Bridge architecture by the first quarter of 2011. To do that it will have to ship hundreds of thousands desktop processors powered by the new micro-architecture by Christmas.
But it appears that Intel wants to make sure that there is a wide range of Sandy-Bridge-based chips running on the desktop. Sandy Bridge will be available as Core i7, Core i5, Core i3, Pentium ranges, X-Bit claims.
Already in Q1 2011, Intel plans to rather substantially increase the share of its Sandy Bridge chips among desktop processors to around 12 per cent and then increase this in the second quarter.
This will be when Intel intends to release Pentium processors powered by the new micro-architecture for entry-level markets.
It looks like the first Intel Sandy Bridge chips will feature two or four cores with Turbo Boost and Hyper-Threading technology as well as integrated graphics processor that will actually be on the same die as the x86 cores.
The chips will address mainstream market segments currently served by Intel Core i7, Core i5 and Core i3 processors, hence, there will be a lot of different models with 65W (dual-core, quad-core)or 95W (quad-core) thermal design power.
The new processors will use LGA1155 form-factor and will be compatible with platforms based on the Intel 6-series chipsets code-named Cougar Point.
Whhat is strange is that Intel seems to be ignoring USB 3 as a capability of the core logic. Some Intel-series chipsets will also not support PCI.
I invented a CPU cooler - 3 times better than best - better than water. Intel have major CPU cooling problems - "Intel's microprocessors were generating so much heat that they were melting" (iht.com) - try to talk to them - they send my communications to my competitor & will not talk to me.
Winners of major 'Corporate Social Responsibility' awardS!!!
Huh!!!!
When did RICO get repealed?"
INVENTORS - DO NOT TRUST INTEL!!!
BTW, I have the evidence - my competitor gave it to me.
BBTW, I am prepared to apologise to Intel if;
• They can show that the actions were those of a single individual in the company, acting outside corporate policy, and:
• They gain redress on my behalf.
Although playing a major role in it's facilitation, the power of the internet appears to have come as much a surprise to Intel as it has to the catholic church.
Inventors - help your fellow inventors - share your experiences with companies - good and bad.
WARNING - DELETING THIS POST VIOLATES MY RIGHT OF FREE SPEECH AND IS AGAINST THE INTEREST OF INVENTORS - WHO ARE TRYING TO SOLVE THE MANY PROBLEMS ON THIS PLANET.
I ACCEPT FULL RESPONSIBILITY FOR VERACITY OF ABOVE.
COMPLAINTS - FORWARD TO STUART21 AT MAC.COM
APOLOGIES FROM INTEL - FORWARD ALSO TO STUART21 - BUT QUICKLY! I CAN'T HOLD MY BREATH MUCH LONGER!! :-)
You should have gotten a patent and struck a deal with a manufacturer before you went to Intel. Or have them sign a legally-binding, non-disclosure agreement before showing it to them.
Showing someone else an invention without any legal protection is just asking to have it stolen.
Prove where Intel actually broke a law, and you might have a case. Just whining because of your lack of due diligence doesn't cut it.
Expecting a corporation to "do the right thing" is pointless. Companies are in business to make money; business "ethics" is whatever you have to do to keep from getting hurt too much if found out. Emotions and feelings have no place in business transactions. Trust needs to be earned, not expected a priori.
Chalk it up to hopefully "a lesson learned" and move on.
So Be Happy, get another dog & Keep Writing. Intel Probably FEARS Troubles Outsiders With litttle Strength in Legal team dept, From Sell Out Torting to Anyone Under Sun Torting, To lack of follow Up & NO Understanding where idea evolved from or where to go with IT.
STeWie Knows, Its' TS Part, LevenWorth Prison & possible Corruption that take Blind Side of billion Dollar Mfg In Second, While just having part mfg'd & soldon ones own, little market In First Place. Maybe Gov't Grant to Develope Coolers Might be better.
Drashek of Dixie Narco.
Does she come complete?
if Intel tries to build
a better float?
Do you need Sandpolo
to have a beach?
In the days of yore,
Mageeks may tell you,
Intel won out
of shire agreeability
with Windows for Workgroups,
where AMDs hung for gramercy.
LGA1156 is less more than LGA1366.
The two step Tock Tick
The basic foot work
including the Tango Walk
forward and backward pivot
Inside outside
Where have I been?
Out of my brain
CHA-rge CHA-rge CHA-rge
Without the Sandy Bridges
of Made-us-some bounty
You soon be treading water, chide.
Intel would have you
believe that it charts
the best course for
a whole industry.
But beneath the mirky surface,
lurks the oily disallusionment
that hey! *snorkle*
Intel's innit for the money,
ain't it not sweet sow's and so?
The alchemistic Metallurgy
where the molten metal
must pape the piper's
flowings into
the smaller channels
in which the pigs do so solidify.
Rinse and repeat.
Again and again.
Intel is slipping you the rod,
Rodney.
Here is the rub: do pigs swim?
Why should they, where pigs fly?
Intel is stealthily
doing the backstroke,
removing all the
other guy's trunks.
It's alright,
hey lawdy mama,
it's alright
Don't you know
they're all the same
Only difference
is the name.
Intel's App store is
its chipsets. And, it
is becoming an exclusive pool
in a walled garden.
And when the Light Peaks
revealing the naked pigskins,
Intel will sop you up again.
drip
I'm you Hoochie Coochie, man