We can fly to the Moon but we can't have a phone call with reasonable quality. Why? TechEye talks to Xconnect's Eli Katz on how we can hear each other better and what's in the pipeline for telecoms the world over.
Back in 1936 - 74 years ago - boffins accepted that about 3.3Khz was the accepted frequency that telephone calls are going to run on and it's been like that, generally, ever since. Call quality is reasonable but leaves a lot to be desired. Think calls from Skype to Skype where quality is often crystal clear.
But actually, call delivery which features excellent quality and a much higher frequency is completely possible. It's essentially, in simple terms, the same change media went through when ditching the analogue tape for CD and IP calls are the catalyst for that change. HD Voice is the way forward and it's going to be good.
IP and HD voice has taken off in the States and in Asia but the UK and Europe has been slower to adopt. Orange just announced that it's going to take the leap which is in a sense making not just one leap, but two - since mobile phone calls are generally of poorer quality than landline, taking the jump into HD voice is gung-ho but a good idea. Eli Katz tells us that most new Private Branch Exchanges (or PBX) and handsets are equipped to work with HD voice, it's just the matter of setting up the service on networks and tweaking acoustics appropriately.
And for businesses which want HD on their PBX, the price is almost marginal - just a couple of dollars more could make all the difference for call quality.
The technology for HD Voice has been around for a couple of years already, but only seen adoption that brings it to the forefront in the last six months or so though we're told that in the widest sense of the telecoms industry, adoption is happening on way or another. Migration is already happening and that includes fixed line, mobile, web, Skype, enterprise PBXs, Apple Facetime - anything you can think of. HD Voice is just one of the "new services" that is delivered by IP now. The old legacy stuff is rubbish for video calling and the like.
It's a small matter of getting the networks to play ball and have the right telco exchanges and systems in place for it to start getting widespread usage. That is where Xconnect comes in - but we're told that everyone's playing ball. Xconnect has some very high profile customers many of which can't be named because of the curse of the Non Disclosure Agreement, but some we do know about are Korea Telecom and a long list of tier ones in the States as well as cable operators in the Netherlands.
"The challenge is that, despite the technology on the way to toward adoption, the underlying interconnect structure hasn't really changed," Katz tells us. "Take Skype as an example. Skype to Skype offers a healthy range of services, it uses super-wideband on audio and obviously there is video. But all of those services are only available on Skype to Skype. So if you use Skype out or in, you lose that all and go to what is literally the lowest common denominator, you go back to plain voice call only, back to 3.3Khz."
The reason, says Xconnect, is that the underlying structure has not kept up with the technology being developed. It's understandable - when SMS text messages first did the rounds it was initially only available within the same network as the service provider. If you were on T-Mobile, you could only text message others on T-Mobile. The next step was to figure out an interconnect mechanism on a cross network basis.
The benefits of cross network interconnects speak for themselves. Just take a look at how popular SMSing is now - first it could be used nationally and now it's a global standard.
The word on the telco street is that with the "new" services, the IP based services, similar steps are being taken to sort out cross networks. The next step, beyond offering the services to customers, is bringing it all together - and that's where Xconnect comes in.
At the moment Xconnect reckons it's leading the way on IP interconnections. A driver for using Xconnect's services is Federation, which has backing from important sounding telecoms networks. If a service provider is still at the regular, voice only service, it'll want to seek an IP connection base through Federation. This works on a hub and spoke network model and, contrary to older legacy systems, it will take information on the most direct route. The older network models will usually take four or five hops to get to their destination - and that impacts on the end quality as well as cost.
Federation, which has been adopted by the GSM Association (GSMA), takes the most efficient and direct route. For new services, it's basically the only mechanism that can be used, and it takes two core concepts. Firstly it uses something called ENUM which is essentially like a yellow pages database for delivery points. It figures out where the perfect delivery point for the service in the world is and heads straight there. It maps telephone addresses to an IP world. Multimedia Interconnect backs it all up and is used to deal with any technical, commercial or contractual challenges.
Basically Federation is more efficient and scalable. It has more support for new services and is the nuts and bolts of the telephony world that's just emerging and beginning to make its way to the front line of both consumer and business minds.
As well as Xconnect, Katz is founder of the Internet Telephony Services Providers' Association and Xconnect has the backing of the Institution of Engineering and Technology.
We thought we'd ask him about LTE and WiMAX. He did not comment on which technology is going to gain the upper-hand but he did tell us that the Federation interconnect is going to be vital for the technologies. Any operators who want to go for it just have to be ready themselves, as it's waiting to be used in addition to the other 200 providers it supports.
In the meantime we asked what's next for Xconnect - Katz told us that the next focus will be on video.
Growth is happening across all segments, consumer, business and enterprise. We can expect services like HD Voice to really up the game and make telephony a better experience, in the workplace and at home.
Operators in the UK are beginning to take on the idea and we'll see a push over the next couple of years. And like what happened with SMS, they'll be on the same wavelength soon enough.
*EyeSee - With video next on the agenda, we mentioned Cisco which has recently been acquiring companies left right and centre. It's gearing up for an announcement at IBC 2010 in Amsterdam on video. We asked Katz if he knew what Cisco was up to and if it is going to release something that'll blow the industry away. He said: "Rest assured, that is a safe assumption to make." We didn't get any more than that but watch this space.
Strictly you could go full CD-quality today - the technology exists today but it also existed in the 1930s to have the same 20+ KHz audio bandwidth. The trade-off is that you increasing bandwidth necessarily requires sacrificing channel count which affects congestion, performance and profits. There are some algorithms that are possible with the greater flexibility of IP connections but the trade must always be made - there are no free lunches.
Seriously, lad, who sold you that bill of goods?
BT has about 2 million HD voice (G.722) endpoints deployed. Here in the states, you've got a lot of little islands that aren't linked together... 8x8 has maybe 150K users, largest one...
First off, in businesses, we've been using digital PBX systems with digital phones for at least the past 10 years. The CODECs do vary, G.7XX CODECs have been the based of course, but for the most part, I haven't even heard of an analog installation since the creation of ISDN.
Second, unlike in the U.S., our mobile phone services work. We've had almost 100% proliferation of GSM and later phones in Europe for 12-15 years. People keep their land lines only as a means for cheap international calls. Otherwise, we use mobile phones. Households of all age groups are rapidly canceling their land-line subscriptions (of which many have had for 30+ years) in favor of sticking just to their mobile phones. If it weren't for house cleaning, most land line telephones would have substantial dust build up.
Third, almost all people who have looked at their phone bills at least once and have broadband (over 75% in Scandinavia have 2MBit DSL or better) have switched to SIP based systems. The reason? Free calling (domestic and a lot of foreign). $30 a month for a phone plan that covers all the calling as well is nice. Many of us paid upwards of $100 using the Scandinavian "Ma' Bell"s.
These days, many houses have land lines only because they're included for free as part of the broadband packages they use. By purchasing a triple play package (tv, phone, internet), I got 30/30mbit/s for the same price as if I only ordered 10/10mbit/s and basic cable. So, the phone line isn't even connected as I use another service which is cheaper to call on.
When you talk about Europe like this, you're referring to places like Greece, Italy, England, etc... In civilized European countries, we are up to date with unmetered 3G/4G internet access, fiber to the home with options for 400Mbit symmetrical or better access, etc... It's only the countries with either no money or a cast system which suffers from living in the stone ages.
For free evaluation version of the Personal PBXMate please visit: http://www.solicall.com/products.html#PersonalPBXMate
Doug, concerning uptake - it's what we've heard whether it has been rolled out already or not
asahjaya, JG - You're right, sorry.
Darren - Interesting
Adam - In future please just send me an email rather than posting links on the site if you think we should look at a client
My name is Adam Smith and I represent PBX Plus which is based on the award winning (Best of Show for SMB at IT Expo, LA 2009) platform – InVox.
Now PBX Plus launched its new release and is offering Virtual/Hosted PBX Services free of cost with so many advanced features like call forwarding, free speech recognition, voicemail and voicemail transcription, eFAX, unlimited extensions and sub-extensions etc. For the first time in the industry, PBX+ offers coverage in 40 countries. I would be happy to add a FREE US or UK number with unlimited minutes to your account.
* 60 Man-Year patent-pending technology
* Unmatched Feature Guarantee
* Free Signup and unlimited testing
* Award Winning Drag and Drop Designer
* Voice/Speech Driven
* Third Party Integrations like ZOHO, SUGAR, Sales Force etc.,
The drag and drop designer can be used to configure PBX in just 5 to 10 minutes. Wizard configures the PBX based on the answers to each question about your business.
To get a Free US or UK number with free services, I suggest you to signup (It’s a free signup. No credit card is required) and review the website for more features. You can also sign-in Using your Gmail or Yahoo ID and build your phone system with unlimited trail and testing.
Not sure who's telling you what, but Europe is MUCH farther along the HD voice/wideband curve than the U.S.
Orange has 500K broadband HD, BT 2M broadband HD in the consumer world. In the mobile world, it's light years more advanced on HD, with Orange covering Europe with mobile HD (AMR-WB) service and other mobile carriers starting to show their HD cards in France and the UK.
BT's marketing-speak calls HD voice “Hi-dS (High definition sound)" and (of course) makes no reference to G.722 until you pull it out of a spokesperson. I guess they got their marketing savvy from BP...
In the U.S., there are a lot of little HD voice islands on the business VoIP carriers, but that's it. 8x8/Packet 8 is moving out of "little" with around 150K-180K customers; you add up all the guys hooked up through the Xconnect U.S. trial and maybe they add up to about the same number (150K). Maybe; we don't know because XConnect and/or the Cloud Computing guys have not published numbers on end points, so draw your own conclusions in that regard if they hid behind the "private company" defense when they won't talk about it.
Consumerwise, ooma says they are going to roll out HD voice to its Telo customer base by the end of September, but they've been saying that on the record since January. They may have up to 75K-100K Telo handsets deployed. Maybe. Ojo/WorldGate is also cranking out a bunch of videophones with G.722 onboard...
The potential game-changer in the US: Verizon Business is expected to support HD voice (G.722) by the end of the year through their Enterprise VIPER VoIP service; that's when life starts to get interesting on interconnects since VB has multinational Fortune 1000 customers already using VoIP with Polycom phones that have had HD voice built in for the past two years...
Net-net: There are a larger number of smaller guys doing HD in the U.S. But -- right now -- Europe has major carriers more aggressively doing HD voice -- it's in Orange's freakin' catalog -- and those carriers have deployed & documented many more HD voice endpoints. Mobile is all Europe; I don't think anyone in the States is ready to do HD voice for at least a year or two; U.S. mobile carriers are still doing the "How do we do Voice over IP just like we handle phone calls?" dance with LTE and WiMAX.
My best to you and your pops!