A paper written by two Texas academics indicates that Apple is no longer a maker of over priced gadgets but acts and behaves like a religion. The paper with the catchy title "How the iPhone Became Divine: New Media, Religion and the Intertextual Circulation of Meaning" is penned by Heidi A. Campbell and Antonio C. La Pastina both of Texas A&M University.
The paper's central idea is that religious metaphors explain how Apple and its followers behave and how religious language may communicate both positive and negative aspects of a technology and instigate an unintentional trajectory in popular discourse as it is employed by different audiences, both online and offline.
The idea of Apple being a religion is not new. In my novel "When a Tree Falls", I wrote of a parallel universe where Apple becomes a techno religion following the death of Steve Jobs. But lately things seem to be getting worse.
Basically religious myths have several core elements.
Firstly they have to explain a creation. It does not have to explain the creation of the universe. In this case it is the creation of an Apple fanboy from a 1970s nerd. This Apple fanboy, and the article does not use the term, "highlighting the counter-cultural origin and emergence of the Apple Mac as a transformative moment".
There has to be a hero myth. In this case it is the Mac and its founder Steve Jobs as saving its users from the corporate domination of the grey PC world.
It is a myth largely because of Satan. There has to be a myth of ultimate evil. This role in Apple land presents Bill Gates as the anti-Christ when Microsoft really has not been a competitor with Apple.
However Microsoft is always evoked as the anti-Apple Satan. People who say bad things about Apple must be pro-Microsoft, even when the person might be an Open Sauce fanboy.
Then there is a death and resurrection Myth of the hero returning to save a failing company which was nearly bought by Microsoft (Satan again). To these points we would add another myth. All good religions need a bit of persecution even when there is a lack of evidence.
All major religions have myths of murdered martyrs and saints. Even the relatively new religion of Wicca has a myth of the "burning times" which claims that millions of witches were burnt in the Middle Ages.
In the case of Apple there is a belief that only they are "thinking different" and the rest of the world hates Them. Actually the rest of the world hates them for being brain dead morons who spend too much money on an MP3 player and smugly tell everyone how superior their toys are. We guess some persecution is justified.
Apple is essentially a cargo cult where you buy the stairway to heaven. Happiness is found by a like-minded community of people who all share your philosophy and always buy what ever Steve happens to want to sell you.
Magic is not the art and science of changing consciousness at will, it is turning on an iPad. A miracle is not turning water into wine, it is getting a large number of MP3s onto a single hard drive.
To anyone who has had religious experiences it seems paper thin, hollow and above all incredibly stupid. It is like those other modern religions fundamentalist flavours of the Christianity and Muslim religion, none of which existed before the late 19th century, only without the intelligence or subtlety.
In the iPhone Flaw Fiasco Steve Jobs posted a slide which said "We love our users, we built 300 shops for them." Yes, Jesus loves you, he built you a shop where you can buy things. Don't worry about improving yourself, trying to overcome your material and spiritual limitations. Go to an Apple store and let Steve hawk you something and you will be better.
When I saw that slide, I could not help but thinking what Bill Hicks would have said. Probably along the lines of "Stores are not Cathedrals you sick f***. The money changers have taken over the temples and are replacing meaning with the dollar." Then there would be a pause while the Apple fanboys waited for a joke and Hicks would say. "There is no punchline - you are lowering the spiritual standards of the world and you should be ashamed."
Certainly Campbell and Pastina's theory works when it comes to the recent iPhone fiasco. If it was a product people would be demanding their money back. Shares would plummet and the company would eventually backtrack.
However Jobs dealt with it as he would the leader of a religious community in trouble – he blamed an outside force for his cock-up. In this case he blamed the press for persecution. Apple blaming the press is a bit like blaming your loyal dog for your own farts.
Early converts to the Apple religion were the US press which has shown itself unable to print any Apple heresy. He essentially said: "Our phone is broken in the same way that everyone's is broken, but we have been persecuted."
Instantly the Apple fanboy community goes into defence mode. They forget their broken phones. This is an attack on what they actually believe in. They must rally and see off the persecution. For Jobs it is problem solved and he does not have to replace anyone's gear.
In the middle of it all though, I don't think that Jobs believes in his own religion. I dunno why. I guess it is because I don't think he is that stupid.
Please do not insult Catholics by implying there is equivalence between the One, True Church, and a bunch of fanatical, hairy, hygene-challenged monkey-boys, worshiping an evil man and his poorly designed and manufactured crap.
Following Apple is easier than religion. I can hold what they are selling, and there is no sex abuse. Well, so far.
As such, why did the Avataras, should they exist, came? They came to potentialised the stages of human Evolution and not to institute a religion of blind faith [because the kinesis was never there/almost impossible to attain, but it effortlessly possible now – we just do not need to participate in any self-destructive activity]. Non-thinkers have no means of realising true thoughts because other than having very limited thoughts, those lacking the ability of true speech, are unable to utter the full vowels and consonants. When such entities try to think, all they’ll perceived are shades of light & darkness. There are no real thoughts. That’s why they will only stare at you because no thoughts are in the offing. Teaching a dog words to associate a purpose might increase its vocabulary, but it cannot go beyond those very limited associations. Humans have zero means of conferring the concepts of beauty and filth to a dog and when it comes to arithmetic, that’s a foregone conclusion. Reality is not about being better or worse. Reality is about Reality and little else.
As such, non-thinkers are only the “props” within the Play of Evolution, they are not part of Reality [of the Play]. These entities will only evolve after they have passed on should they be selected again and it is a selection because they have zero means of determining their evolution, not being able to think. Therefore, eat more “natural” [but not “organic” because those are just part of the money game] chickens [but not an animal physically larger than you or else their “genetic content” will “influenced” yours – witness the musculature of cow and pig eaters, the “piggers” have a smoother muscle texture]. In contrast, humans could only evolve whilst they are physically alive,[ so make the most of it and not merely crossing the road for no good reason other than for “entertainment”, or else should one decides to return to face another round of “music”, it will become more difficult – just witness the “tree-stumps” and the “privileged”].
Just imagine, how difficult it would be for, say, a Jobsman, to decide between his FFI [Fame, Fortune & Immortality, oka his “divinity”] and the acceptance of his humility should “God” appears before him. Perhaps the sketch might go:
“Give it up my son”
‘And who are you?’
“I am the Truth you’d been seeking for”
‘Prove to me who you are’
“Only those who has guilt, needs to prove his humility”
‘I am the god here, it is you who needs to prove to me’
“I am reflected within you and all true humans, you will find me within your Self, the proof is there between your vested self and your greater Self”
‘That is not what my worshippers are saying – be gone’
….. and with that, the Liver/Attention [a person’s means for guiding his Empowerment] went. What else is going to follow suit? Perhaps the mesmerism, pretty please ……….
When you lack the empowerment/expression of your knowledge, knowledge then becomes your religion and such a religion becomes your possession/attachment/ownership-issues. All the religious nutters [want to] own their religion/their-god. They put their god in their pockets and will only take him out when they need something done, as in passing exams, driving away evils, buying a house, a carpet, winning a battle or even a war, and especially when they need a big, big, favour – like selling zillions more addictive gadgets. Perhaps the white[r-than-white] version conveys the sense of smoothness, luxury, and privilege - “To compliment your smoother, whiter than white complexion – you beautiful, wonderful, thang, you”. ‘Ohh, you are sooo perceptive, you, I’ll have 3 of those then … one to Face, one to Tweet, and one for when I’m bogging … and you’d better pay those tree-stumps more for their enslavement or else I can’t be seen to be ……’ And they say that even Presidents and Queens are joining the relgious fanfare …. If nothing else, privilege has its moments of FFI.
I've been avoiding buying your novel; not because I fear being disappointed, but I sorely could use the cash. I am therefore the outcast pagan.
Would it not be so grand to be the shooting star of the Applenee?
You are best prepared to right.
I haven't yet decided if you are here to sell rice, or exercise the rice rings.
toodle pip I've got to go
Just answer "yes" or "no". Thanks in advance.
Did you read Campell's & LaPastina's article before you wrote you story?
Just answer "yes" or "no". Thanks in advance.
d^_^bIt is very interesting. .<a href="http://www.efox-shop.com/" rel="nofollow"> Sciphones i68,ciphone c6,Ciphone,cecthandy,Sciphones ,cecthandys,hiphone,HIPHONE 4,pinphone 3gs </a>
@rich wargo: whereas god coming to earth, working as a carpenter for 30 yrs, then preaching and finally getting murdered is believable? Catholicism particularly: the holy trinity!? Mary "Mother of God"!? Which is it, was Christ the son of god, or was he god, or was he just a man!? Hordes of saints interceding for us!?
Come on man, Catholicism is a massive syncretism and it make no sense at all.
@rich wargo: Catholicism is a massive syncretism and it make no sense at all.